Preview

SRISA Proceedings

Advanced search

Modeling the Defense of Weak Prey Agents Against a Strong Predator Agent

https://doi.org/10.25682/NIISI.2025.1.0009

Abstract

We constructed and studied a model of interaction between a community of relatively weak prey  agents and a strong predator agent in a two‑dimensional grid world (a lattice environment typical of grid automata and agent-based models). The predator can attack, kill, and consume prey agents. Each prey agent is controlled by a neural network and adopts one of two behavioral strategies: (1) normal activity, or (2) defense against the predator. In the normal activity strategy, prey agents lie dormant, feed, breed, and move through the grid. In the defense strategy, they attempt to escape, threaten, or attack the predator. The neural network outputs control each agent’s ac tions. The predator follows a simpler, rule-based protocol: it can lie dormant, evade threatening prey, or attack them. Its behavior is governed by basic logic. We analyzed the model using computer simulations. We found that, with realistic parameters, the prey agents collectively overcome the predator: prey resource levels increase steadily, while the predator’s resources decline to zero, leading to its extinction. We also discovered that successful defense requires a sufficiently abundant food supply; when prey food is scarce, the predator successfully suppresses the prey population. We used computer simulation to analyze the model. When the prey agents’ food supply is low, the predator agent suppresses the prey agents. 

About the Author

V. G. Red’ko
NRC "Kurchatov Institute" — SRISA
Russian Federation


References

1. C.G. Langton (ed.). Artificial Life: The Proceedings of an Interdisciplinary Workshop on the Synthe sis and Simulation of Living Systems. Redwood City CA: Addison-Wesley, 1989.

2. C.G. Langton, C. Taylor, J.D. Farmer, S. Rasmussen (eds.). Artificial Life II: Proceedings of the Second Artificial Life Workshop. Redwood City CA: Addison-Wesley, 1992.

3. L.S. Yaeger. Computational genetics, physiology, metabolism, neural systems, learning, vision, and behavior or PolyWorld: Life in a new context. In: C.G. Langton (Ed.). Proceedings of the Artificial Life III Conference. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1994, 263–298.

4. D. Ackley, M. Littman. Interactions between learning and evolution. In [2], 487–509.

5. M. Burtsev, P. Turchin. Evolution of cooperative strategies from first principles. “Nature”, V. 440 (2006), No. 7087, 1041–1044.

6. K. Lorenz. On Aggression. London, New York, Routledge Classics, 2002.

7. V.G. Red’ko. Model of collective interaction in competing groups of autonomous agents. In: V. Redko, D. Yudin, W. Dunin-Barkowski, B. Kryzhanovsky, Y. Tiumentsev (eds). Advances in Neural Com putation, Machine Learning, and Cognitive Research VIII. NI 2024. Studies in Computational Intelligence, V. 1179, Springer, Cham, 2025, 345–352.

8. M.A. Semenov, D.A. Terkel. Об эволюции механизмов изменчивости посредством косвенного отбора. Journal of General Biology, Vol. 46 (1985), No. 2, pp. s271–277.

9. Red’ko V.G A Model of Interaction and Competition Between Two Types of Autonomous Agents. Russian Journal of Cybernetics. Vol. 6 (2025), No. 1, pp. 128–136.


Review

For citations:


Red’ko V.G. Modeling the Defense of Weak Prey Agents Against a Strong Predator Agent. SRISA Proceedings. 2025;15(1):65-71. https://doi.org/10.25682/NIISI.2025.1.0009

Views: 15


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2225-7349 (Print)