Aim and Scope

Our mission is to publish significant results and offer leading professionals a platform to share their work with the research community and general public, to serve as a discussion platform that brings together prominent global scientists and the next generation of researchers.

We focus on theoretical and applied achievements in information technology, microelectronics, systems analysis, and artificial intelligence to share up-to-date scientific information and facilitate new research.

We mostly publish original articles with the results of basic, pilot, and applied research, as well as reviews. At the discretion of the Editorial Board, we also may publish articles on the history of science and technology, personalities, a calendar of conferences and seminars, and other suitable announcements and notes in the Others section. The journal is international in its scope. We welcome articles from any country.

Section Policies

I. SYSTEM ANALYSIS, CONTROL, INFORMATION PROCESSING, STATISTICS

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

II. COMPUTING SYSTEMS AND THEIR COMPONENTS

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

III. MATHEMATICAL AND SOFTWARE SUPPORT FOR COMPUTING SYSTEMS, COMPLEXES AND COMPUTER NETWORKS

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

IV. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND MACHINE LEARNING

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Publication Frequency

Quarterly

Open Access Policy

Full texts of articles accepted for publication are available in open access on the journal's official website and in open-access databases. They are available on the website of the eLIBRARY.RU Scientific Electronic Library. All articles are open-access content. 

Archiving

• Russian State Library (RSL)
• National Electronic-Information Consortium (NEICON)

Peer-Review

We are a peer-reviewed journal. We use a single-blind review process (the author does not know who the reviewer is).

1. All reviewers are recognized experts in the subject matter of the reviewed articles and have publications on the subject matter of the reviewed articles. Articles are reviewed by members of the Editorial Board and invited reviewers who are leading experts in their fields. The Chief Editor, Assistant Chief Editor, and Editorial Board Manager appoint reviewers. Each article is reviewed by one reviewer. The review period is 3-4 weeks. It can be extended at the reviewer's request.
2. The reviewer has the right to refuse to review an article in the event of a clear conflict of interest that affects the perception and interpretation of the article. Once review is completed, the reviewer provides recommendations to the authors article and makes one of the following decisions (and is required to provide supporting arguments):
   • Accept as it is
   • Revise and accept
   • Review by another expert
   •  
3. If a review contains proposed revisions, the Editorial Board sends the review to the author for consideration. The author may accept or reject (in part or in full) the proposed revisions and provide arguments for this. A revision should not take more than two months from the date of an email notification to the authors. The revised article is sent back for review.
4. If the authors refuse to revise the article, they should notify the Editorial Board in writing or by phone/in person about their decision not to publish the article. If the authors do not submit a revised version within 3 months from the date of sending the review, the article is rejected, even if the authors do not notify the Editorial Board about their refusal to revise the article. In such situations, the authors are notified that the article is rejected due to the expiration of the revision period.
5. If the author and reviewer cannot agree, the Editorial Board reserves the right to initiate additional review. In such conflicts, the Chief Editor makes the final decision at a meeting of the Editorial Board.
6. following the results of the review. An article rejected by the Editorial Board will not be re-accepted. A rejection notification is emailed to the author.
7. Once the Editorial Board accepts a paper for publication, the author is notified of the publication date.
8. A positive review is not sufficient for publication. The Editorial Board makes the final decision. In case of a conflict, the Chief Editor makes the final decision.
9. The Editorial Board keeps the originals of the reviews for 5 years. The Editorial Board also undertakes to send copies of reviews to the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation upon request.

Publishing Ethics

The journal’s policy follows the principles of scientific ethics and integrity in accordance with the policies of international associations and organizations such as COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics), ORI (the Office of Research Integrity), CSE (Council of Science Editors), EASE (European Association of Science Editors), and ANRI (Association of Scientific Editors and Publishers) guidelines which establish ethical standards for all parties involved in the publication process (authors, editors, reviewers, publishers, and research community). The Editorial Board keeps any information received from authors and any other unpublished information confidential. The Editorial Board notifies authors about the article review/publication status. Submitted articles are processed if they meet the journal’s areas of interest, comply with general principles of ethics, and meet formatting requirements. Before submitting your article, please read our ethics statement.

1. Introduction

1.1. Publishing in peer-reviewed journals is not only a scientific communication, but also a significant contribution to the progress of science. There are generally accepted ethical standards for all stakeholders: Authors, SRISA Proceedings Editors, Reviewers, Publisher, and the Research Community.

1.2. The Publisher supports scientific communication and invests in it, but it is also responsible for the compliance of published works with ethical standards.

1.3. The Publisher undertakes to strictly verify research papers for such compliance. The Editorial Board creates a chronicle of scientific progress and research and is therefore responsible for the proper presentation of published content, especially in terms of ethical aspects.

2. Responsibilities of the Editors

2.1. Making a Decision to Publish

The Editor of SRISA Proceedings is personally and independently responsible for making a decision to publish, and may consult with the research community, primarily with the members of the Editorial Board. The key criteria are the validity and significance of an article. The Editor follows SRISA Proceedings Editorial Policy and complies with legal requirements regarding libel, copyright, and plagiarism. The Editor may consult with other editors and reviewers (or other researchers) when making a decision.

2.2. Integrity

The Editor must evaluate the content without any discrimination based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, origin, citizenship, or political views of the Authors.

2.3. Confidentiality

The Editor and Editorial Board of the SRISA Proceedings journal may not disclose information about accepted papers to anyone except the Authors, Reviewers, potential Reviewers, other consultants, and the Publisher.

2.4. Disclosure Policy and Conflicts of Interest

2.4.1 Unpublished data obtained from articles submitted for review may not be used in other research without prior written consent of the Author. Potentially beneficial Information or concepts obtained during the review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain.

2.4.2 The Editors must recuse themselves from reviewing articles (request a Co-editor, Assistant Editor, or engage other members of the Editorial Board to review the article instead of reviewing and making decisions themselves) in the event of conflicts of interest due to competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with the Authors, companies, and possibly other organizations associated with the article.

2.5. Compliance Monitoring

An editor who has found convincing evidence that the statements or conclusions presented in an article are invalid must inform the Publisher (and/or the scientific community) to promptly notify them of changes, retraction, expression of concern, and other appropriate statements.

2.6. Engagement and Collaboration in Research

The Editor, with the Publisher (or scientific community), takes appropriate action in response to ethical complaints concerning articles under review or published articles. Such actions generally include discussions with the Authors and providing the reasons for such a complaint/claim. The organizations and research centers may also be involved.

3. Responsibilities of Reviewers

3.1. Influence of Reviewers on Editorial Board Decisions

The peer review process helps the Editor make a decision to publish or, through communication with the Authors, help the Authors refine their work. Peer review is a required stage of scientific communication and is fundamental to the scientific method. The Publisher shares the view that all researchers who support the publication process are expected to perform substantial work in reviewing.

3.2. Diligence

Any selected Reviewer who feels insufficiently qualified to review an article or who does not have sufficient time to complete the review in time should notify the SRISA Proceedings. Editor and request to be excluded from the review process for the article in question.

3.3. Confidentiality

Any article submitted for review should be treated as confidential. Such articles may not be disclosed to or discussed with any persons not appointed by the Editor.

3.4. Requirements for Articles. Fairness of Review

The reviewer must be objective in their assessment. Personal criticism of the author is unacceptable. Reviewers should express their opinions clearly and with supporting arguments.

3.5. Identification of Original Sources

Reviewers should identify significant published works on the subject matter not included in the article’s list of references. An article must include a reference to any published statement (observation, conclusion, or argument). The reviewer should also bring to the Editor's attention any substantial similarity between the article under review and any other published work to the extent of the reviewer's knowledge.

3.6. Disclosure Policy and Conflicts of Interest

3.6.1 Unpublished data obtained from articles submitted for review may not be used in other research without the prior written consent of the Author. Potentially beneficial Information or concepts obtained during the review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain.

3.6.2 Reviewers must recuse themselves from reviewing articles in the event of conflicts of interest due to competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with any of the Authors, companies, and possibly other organizations associated with the article.

4. Responsibilities of Authors

4.1. Requirements for Articles

4.1.1 Authors of an original research article should provide valid results of their work and an objective discussion of the significance of the research. The basic data must be presented error-free. A paper must contain details and references sufficient to reproduce the research. False or knowingly misleading statements are considered unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

4.1.2. Review articles must also be accurate and objective, and the editorial opinion must be clearly stated.

4.2. Data Storage and Access Policy

Authors may be asked to provide raw data for review by the Editors. Authors should be prepared to provide open access to such information (in accordance with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if feasible, and in any case must retain the data for a sufficient period after publication.

4.3. Authenticity and Plagiarism

4.3.1 Authors must confirm that the work submitted is authentic and, if using the work or statements of other authors, provide appropriate references or quotations.

4.3.2 Plagiarism can take many forms, from presenting someone else's work as one's own to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of someone else's work (without attribution) to claiming ownership of someone else's research. Any plagiarism is unethical and unacceptable.

4.4. Multiple, Redundant, and Concurrent Publications

4.4.1 In general, an article on a specific research topic should not be published in more than one journal as an original study. Submitting the same article to more than one journal simultaneously is considered unethical behavior and is unacceptable.

4.4.2. Generally, Authors should not submit a previously published article to other journals.

4.3. Identification of Original Sources

The contributions of others must always be acknowledged. Authors should cite publications significant for their work. Data obtained privately, for example, through conversation, correspondence, or discussions with third parties, should not be used or presented without the express written permission of the source. Information obtained from confidential sources, such as article reviews or grant applications, should not be used without the express written permission of the authors.

4.4. Authorship

4.4.1 Only individuals who have made a significant contribution to the research concept, practice, or interpretation of the results should be the article’s authors. All those who have made a significant contribution should be made Co-authors. Contributors to a specific area of the research should also be mentioned as such.

4.4.2. The Author must make sure that all individuals who have made a significant contribution to the research are listed as Co-authors and that those who did not participate in the research are not listed as Co-authors, and that all Co-authors have read and approved the final version of the article and agreed to its submission.

4.4.3 If the research involves the use of chemical products, procedures, or equipment that may pose unusual risks, the Author must clearly indicate this in the text.

4.4.4 If the research involves experiments on animals or humans, the Authors must indicate that all stages of the research comply with the legal requirements and regulations of the research organizations and have been approved by the committee. The article should clearly state that informed consent has been given by all subjects of the research. Privacy must always be respected.

4.5. Disclosure Policy and Conflicts of Interest

4.5.1 All authors are required to disclose any financial or other conflicts of interest that could be perceived as affecting the results or conclusions presented in the article.

4.5.2 Examples of potential conflicts of interest that must be disclosed include employment, consulting, ownership of shares, fees, expert opinions, patents or patent applications, grants, and other financial support. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed as early as possible.

4.6. Significant Errors in Published Works

If the Author discovers significant errors or inaccuracies in a published paper, they must notify the Editor of the SRISA Proceedings journal and cooperate with the Editor to retract or correct the article as soon as possible. If the Editor or Publisher is notified by a third party that a published paper contains significant errors, the Author is obliged to retract the article or correct the errors as soon as possible.

5. Responsibilities of the Publisher

5.1 The Publisher must follow principles and procedures that promote the ethical performance of the SRISA Proceedings. Editors, Reviewers, and Authors as specified herein. The Publisher must ensure that potential profits from advertising or publishing do not influence the decisions of the Editors.

5.2. The Publisher will support the SRISA Proceedings Editors in dealing with complaints about the ethical aspects of published articles and will assist in communication with other journals and/or Publishers if required.

5.3. The publisher should promote good research practices and implement industry standards to improve ethical guidelines, retraction, and error correction procedures.

5.4 The Publisher will not provide legal assistance (opinion or advice) if necessary.

Founder

Scientific Research Institute for System Analysis of the National Research Centre «Kurchatov Institute» (NRC «Kurchatov Institute» - SRISA)

Author fees

Publication in “SRISA Proceedings" is free of charge for all the authors.

The journal doesn't have any Article processing charges.

The journal doesn't have any Article submission charges.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer’s own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.

Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Plagiarism detection

“SRISA Proceedings" use native russian-language plagiarism detection software Antiplagiat to screen the submissions. If plagiarism is identified, the COPE guidelines on plagiarism will be followed.

Preprint and postprint Policy

The editorial board of the “SRISA Proceedings" allows authors to post the manuscript as a preprint before submission for review and to archive independently their articles in disciplinary and institutional repositories.

Preprints

The editorial board of the “SRISA Proceedings" encourages uploading preprints on preprint servers. The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) defines a preprint as 'a scholarly manuscript posted by the author(s) in an openly accessible platform, usually before or in parallel with the peer review process.' 

A preprint publication shall not be considered duplicate publication nor shall it influence the editor's decision to publish it in the “SRISA Proceedings".

The author must notify the editorial board of the “SRISA Proceedings" about the posted preprint at submission of the manuscript for review, furnishing a link to the preprint with its DOI identifier and the dissemination terms and conditions.

It is the author’s responsibility to add a link to the published manuscript in the preprint record. The link must contain the DOI and the URL of the article published on the journal's website. The original preprint should not be modified based on the reviewer’s and editor’s comments. The preprint should not be replaced with the text of the published article.

Do not delete the preprint text.

Manuscripts Accepted for Publication

The editorial board of the “SRISA Proceedings" allows manuscripts that have been reviewed and are accepted for publication to be archived independently.

 This version of the manuscript may be disseminated through:

-   personal website or blog;

-   institutional repository;

-   disciplinary repository;

-   direct interactions with faculty or students by providing this version of the manuscript for personal use.

The text of the manuscript should contain the author’s clarifications about its status and information about the planned publication.

Example: The ARTICLE TITLE has been reviewed, accepted for publication, and will be published in 2021 (3) of the “SRISA Proceedings".

Once the final version of the manuscript is published, it is the author’s responsibility to add a link to the published article to the publication record. The posted text should not be modified based on the reviewer’s and editor’s comments. Do not replace the text of the posted manuscript. Do not delete the text of the posted manuscript.

Final Versions of Manuscripts

The editorial board of the “SRISA Proceedings" allows manuscripts that have been peer-reviewed, accepted for publication, edited and ready for publication (proofread and typeset) to be archived independently.

 This version of the manuscript may be disseminated through:

-   personal website or blog;

-   institutional repository;

-   disciplinary repository;

-   direct interactions with faculty or students by providing this version of the manuscript for personal use.

 Once the final version of the manuscript is published, it is the author’s responsibility to add a link to the published article to the publication record. The posted text should not be modified based on the reviewer’s and editor’s comments. Do not replace the text of the posted manuscript. Do not delete the text of the posted manuscript.

Revenue Sources

The publication of the journal is financed by the funds of the parent organization, at the expense of the publisher, publication of advertising materials, publication of reprints.